They are screwing-up the black population with crack, then they are taking these people and dumping them on the white population so it will generate white flight. Lets hear you discuss this in your blog. Open some of these secrets to the rest of us, if you are really concerned about the black population (or the population as a whole). If your in a sorority, then you should be in a position to know about these agendas. People like you are are just as damaging to the black community as these Zionists. You are guilty by association. And you have committed the crime of silence. Under the law, this could be considered obstruction of justice.

I was sexually abused as a child for not “playing-along” with these Secret Societies weird racial agendas involving social engineering. I believe that these values should be taught at home by the parents. Secret Societies have no place teaching our kids what race they need to sleep with. My blog:

http://goodcraftsman.wordpress.com/

In her short memoir, “Only Daughter,” Sandra Cisneros portrays herself as the progressive, intelligent female in a male-dominated family and society. She considers herself deserving of the attention of her male superiors despite the widespread sexism that reigns in her community. However, despite her said belief in the importance of a female’s education, Cisneros is no empowered female, no feminist, no independent woman. In fact she is quite the opposite, enforcing the oppressive powers that restrain her by buckling under their weight.
Despite what appears to be movements toward an intelligent independence, her father may be right to say that Cisneros’ education was wasted. Nowhere in the memoir does the reader see Cisneros moving from the forces that oppress her as a woman. Instead, Cisneros oppresses herself, made apparent by her clear desperation for the approval of her father—the patriarch.
Cisneros considers herself deserving of her father’s respect but she does not earn it. Instead, Cisneros passively sails through the life she is dealt. In truth, Cisneros never does anything for herself except for choose to study English. Even her decision to major in English seems driven by petty antagonism, a half-hearted rebellion against her non-English speaking father. Cisneros gently mocks herself, This allowed me the liberty to putter about, embroidering my little poems and stories without my father interrupting with so much as a “What’s that you’re writing?.”
And it only gets worse. Cisneros goes on to confess that “everything [she] has ever written has been to…win [her father’s] approval.” As the only daughter of her family, Cisneros is the minority, and she represents all females of the world. The men in her family already think it beneath them to associate with her. Her father does not bother to challenge the semantics of the Spanish language by distinguishing that he actually has only seis hijos and una hija rather than simply siete hijos. The world and the future of equality of the sexes is resting on Cisneros’ shoulders with each interaction in which she feels unappreciated because she is female, disregarded or rejected. Cisneros could have spoken up when her father wishfully calls her one of his sons. She could have actively found a new, more caring audience to write for and devote herself to. Yet she does nothing to challenge her position, nothing to deserve their respect. She embodies the passive female archetype she claims to be rebelling against, and for that, Cisneros is a failure.

i was just wondering if you could maybe finish off your essay and publish it on the web. It would be a big help as I am doing a debate saying that Goldilocks wasn’t a naughty girl.

THANK YOU!

Log on to your Amazon account and select ‘Sell Items’ from your account profile.

Give it a try.